Not All Inspiration Comes From Good IntentUndeniably, the greatest pleasure that I get these days is through teaching. Music is magical, and when you see the magic emanate through the eyes of a child you know you’re onto something big. Children adore music but not all children are in a position to have it taught to them. My music teacher in high school, Mr. Evans noted on my final report card that “Peter should probably not pursue a career in music”. I still have that report card and throughout the years I’ve always wanted to look up that crotchety old teacher and tell him “Thank you! You’re comments have fueled my aggressive pursuit of a musical career.” Determination is essential in order to achieve any dream and although there will be people trying to dissuade you along the way, nothing gets you through the day more than the inspiration growing from within. Encouragement from your peers, from your teachers and those closest to you.
Todd Rundgren launched has his new philanthropic venture – The Spirit of Harmony Foundation via a Live Webcast at the @NAAM conference today.
Todd introduces us to his foundation and discusses the importance of music education for today’s youth.After personally realizing Todd’s far reaching influences from a distance over the years, it should come as no surprise to me that he’s still there, still influencing me in the most obscure ways. As I begin this new challenge of my own, educating kids about electronic music in the classroom, there’s additional reassurance in my heart knowing that I’m on the right track. Inspiration is a gift. Knowing that you’re capable of inspiring others is the first step toward making it happen and in my opinion, it’s an altruistic means of reaching out and that there’s “Someone That Cares”.
Supportive of the mission of Todd Rundgren’s Spirit of Harmony Foundation, Ringo Starr discusses the importance of music education to today’s youth.Please make a point to stop by Todd’s Facebook page and show your support for the Spirit of Harmony Foundation
B.Y.O.D. in 21st Century language meaning, Bring Your Own Device.With the budget restraints in the public school boards these days, the concept of BYOD is one that most school boards should be thankful for. Three hundred iPads per school, per city, translates to a massive unforeseen budget increase. While it seems like the perfect marriage between school boards and the households, we can’t help but be reminded of the needs of the underprivileged. Not all households can afford to purchase iPads or laptops for their children. Some are on welfare, have low income jobs and are feeling the pressure to “compete” with the Jones’ on many other levels let alone purchasing social devices. Kids will be kids. They see their friends with all these desirable devices and want one too. Who could blame them really? Combine that with most children’s nonchalent attitude regarding their care for their belongings and you’ve now got parents who are hesitant to purchase expensive, but helpful items for their children in the first place, coupled with the reality that they may lose them or break them within a matter of days. Our son loses everything: sweaters, gloves, USB keychains, his lunch bag . . . He has no regard for his belongings no matter how much we impose our suggestions on him as to the proper care of them so, the thought of sending him to school with an iPad or a laptop is very unsettling to us. Whether or not a family can afford to send their children to school with iPad’s and laptops is one thing. The students accountability is yet another. I see this as a good problem to have but one that needs a combined effort from the parent and the teachers (it is after all a collaboration, isn’t it?) to expend more effort on teaching the children about personal accountability in tandem with staying competitive as an academic entry.
” . . . companies may face regulatory obligations, and they’ll certainly have security concerns.”In a classroom consisting of Grade 2 to Grade 8 kids, it’s a pretty smooth marriage. Enter the corporation . . . Consider, for example, data access. Users want easy, immediate access to business information, from a wide variety of devices. But at the same time, companies may face regulatory obligations, and they’ll certainly have security concerns. So businesses will invariably want assurance that their data resides where it is supposed to, and any risk that it may be compromised — say, via a stolen device — can be eliminated. While it’s a huge financial advantage to businesses and schools to have their employees and/or students subsidize their operating costs, we inevitably run into the grey area of “who’s the boss” of these devices (iPads, Cellphones, laptops). When a company demands that they have complete access to your device and insist that corporate passwords be in place before you access personal emails, or Facebook posts, it’s easy to become jaded.
“We can’t rely on secular strategies to solve social inconsistencies.”Do we then teach our children that this is the new “norm”, and they should acknowledge corporate/academic demands or, do we say, “Just wait a second here . . . I’m (collectively) saving you thousands of dollars with this BYOD (savings) strategy, and you want what?” While it’s so convenient on both sides of the spectrum, what’s right? In my opinion, business is business. If you want to compete, belly up to the bar. Provide your employees with the hardware necessary to get the job done. If you’re the employee/student, leave your personal device at home and subscribe to the mandates of your employer. It’s as simple as that. Evolve with the times or get left behind. The employer doesn’t ask you to bring your own desk, chair, computer or telephone to the job. They’re subscribing to your ability to do what THEY need in order to be successful. Why should they request you to BYOD? Convenience is the Mother of disaster in this case. Let’s refocus. With respect to those who cannot afford their own devices, should there be separate rules? i.e.: the school provides those who can’t afford an iPad with an iPad BUT they can’t use that device for any personal data. Seems reasonable, no? NO. This breeds segragration in the classroom and identifies those whom are not in the same class. We need to have hope. Hope that those whom are not as fortunate, someday become more enabled to participate. We can’t rely on secular strategies to solve social inconsistencies. As usual . . . I’d love to hear your opinions. Please login to leave comment…
When I was a kid in school, the only hope I had for ever becoming involved in the recording end of the music business was to land a job in a recording studio, and the average kid’s chance of that ever happening was about 1 in a million. The only other possible option was to get a huge loan from the bank and build your own however, without the experience necessary to run a recording studio, banks didn’t look to favorably on this option.
Even as technology advanced toward the days of the home studio, companies such as Teac/Tascam began making 4 track open reel recorders but for a young teen, these too provided many financial woes. It wasn’t just the recorder that you needed in order to make recordings. You also needed a mixer, microphones, keyboards, guitars, amplifiers, speakers and the list goes on. The kicker is that, none of this high tech, expensive recording equipment guaranteed you with a “hi-fi” result. The equipment was only as good as the operator.
Assuming that you’d made a decent recording, how were you ever going to get it out there to the masses? There were no YouTube or Facebook sites for you to boldly solicit your awesome recordings. You were at the mercy of record companies, managers, publishers and the like. Once again, as a recording engineer, producer or songwriter, you were in the “dime a dozen” category. Millions were trying to do exactly what you were doing but without the assistance of social media.
There were no schools at that time specializing in Recording Engineering or Music Production. You were pretty much on your own unless you happened to know someone in the “biz”. By the mid 1980’s it became even more complicated. Digital technology was introduced. All of a sudden, and in the matter of a couple of years, analog technology was being weeded out in favor of the new digital technology. Vinyl recordings were being replaced with CD’s and computers were being introduced to the recording studios. If you didn’t embrace them, your days were silently numbered.
More and more recording facilities were using a digital recording system called ProTools. The majority of seasoned professionals scoffed at the idea of using a computer to record “high quality” records with and to this day, there are still many who are hanging onto that the theory that analog recordings are still the way to go. Unfortunately, those professionals are now mostly unemployed.